Suggestion for solar control panel

Brian on the solar control panel where you can tick to graph expected solar values can you add an option please to allow plotting a percentage of the expected solar values, so people can choose to plot say 75% of expected. I think this would greatly assist in setting the correct solar threshold for sunny as you could compare your raw solar values to any ‘sunny’ threshold you might want to try and see how it fits against a curve on a sunny day.

Stuart

BTW I’d like to be able to set the % value to be plotted on the same place as the plot button is now, I think it would be better to have a separate value for testing and then only change the actual threshold when happy with the % when compared to the graph.

added:
http://www.weather-display.com/downloadfiles/Weatherd.zip

Thanks very much Brian, I think this will aid people when trying to decide on what sunny threshold to use for their solar sensor.

Stuart

I played around with this and found it helpful in setting my sunny threshold to match the actual solar readings. It appears that my readings on a sunny day are closer to the 80% mark for full sun. As I suspected, all the crap in the air is blocking 20% of the available solar. It will be interesting to see how this changes in the years ahead as we come up with ways to reduce pollution and clean up our act. Hopefully it won’t go the other direction #-o

Until the Sacto vallley agriculture lobby loses its influence I doubt your situation will improve there :frowning:

True. But others have reported similar findings so I don’t think this is confined to my area. I think the northern hemisphere has much worse air quality than the southern.

I agree, since I got my Davis solar I have had to reduce my sunny threshold to 75% otherwise it was saying it was partly cloudy when there were no real clouds anywhere and the sun felt hot when you were out in it.

Stuart

I’ve had a solar sensor for several years, and without a doubt, the solar readings are considerably lower now than 5 years ago from my records.

That’s interresting. I thought my thresholds were fine. I’ll keep an eye on them next time the sun comes out. Don’t know when that will be :roll:

I thought there was something wrong with my VP solar sensor… the W/m2 never got much above 80% expected either. So I compared the output to Davis’s own station in Hayward (on a clear day around the Bay) and found I was only about 2-3% below theirs, so it’s not the sensor per se, it’s the ‘expected’ that’s a bit high for the area/time of day.

Thanks for adding the ability to adjust that Brian!

Best regards,
Ken

I can see now
bumper stickers:
my expected solar reading for the lat/long for the time of day is only 75% and it should be more than 80%, please drive a smaller car !

Well, I’m making my contribution… I drive a Prius :wink:
Ken

in NZ, the vast majority of cars are japanese
i.e 1.3 to 1.6 or sometimes 2.3 size litre engines
compare that to the big Dodge 8 litre cars/trucks/utes i saw lots of in the midwest!

Problem here is that the UK has a very high proportion of company cars and an awful lot of those are big, although not as many 3-5 litre giants as in the USA, most are 2 litres or thereabouts. Also quite a lot of people have fuel cards as well so that does not encourage careful or economic driving. Now I’m retired (or retarded as my son describes it) I do drive a 1200cc petrol car, and since I pay for my own fuel I’m more careful about how much I use :wink: :wink:

Stuart

Brian,
I’ve installed WD 10.37f-build 12 and see the new ‘Plot this as % calculated’ option … I’m guessing that the ‘Always show max solar for time of day…’ has to be checked for it to work.

I do have a question about the ‘Attenuation (*10) finetune’ control … it seems to only allow values of ‘0’ … ‘5’ – what does this control do?

Best regards,
Ken

Oh yes, I agree with that.

Yeah but we have to have bigger engines to offset the loss in efficiency due to all the emissions control equipment :lol:

Well, to be fair, that was certainly true some years ago but current engines are producing horsepower again :smiley:

Comparing hemispheres it’s important to note that something like 87% of the world population lives in the Northern one :wink:

Ken the attenuation factor is the adjustment for the effect of the atmosphere reducing the intensity of the sun. Most of the available calculation routines on the web use this value, and in my view it should only be altered if you live at significant altitude where the atmosphere is thinner and has less effect of reducing the sun’s power. I suppose it could be increased to offfset the effects we all seem to be seeing. Over the next couple of days or so I’ll play with my solar calculator php script on which Brian’s code is based to see how changing it alters the expected values.

Stuart

Thanks Stuart!

We have clear blue sky and very little haze (20+ mile visibility), yet the solar radiation hardly gets above 900W/m2 (expected 1200 or so).

I’ve had to reduce the ‘Sunny’ threshold to 75% just to avoid ‘Mostly Sunny’ where there aren’t any clouds.

Best regards,
Ken

I think 1200 is an unlikely number for an area where the humidity is relatively high due to the bay, and at sea level = full height atmosphere.