Expanding the display capabilities of WDL

I had few ideas for expansion earlier now I have other thoughts that perhaps are very unique to each station’s capabilities. I’m also limited in not knowing how easy it is to program in Shockwave, but here goes a thought.

I have a Boltek lightning detector. It produces a snapshot of the “radar screen” of activity. The WD program loads this image to my web site. When I could get the programming correct I had it shown in WD’s presentation as a web camera image.

Is it possible to make a choice on the graphs list, allow the end user (me and others) to enter the text to be displayed (such as you now have for baro, wind, temp, etc.) and then link this choice to a graphic of our choice? In my case it might be a lightning detector image. In others they may upload a true web cam image, or perhaps a Weather Service radar image of their area?

This would leave a clean crisp low bandwidth download on screen as WDL comes up, but if you really wanted to see some additional material (such as the graphs as you now allow for choices), one might go to that dropdown, choose what one wished to see, and then close out when done looking.

Just another thought…

Dale

Yes that’s possible. I’ve thought about having a custom graphic, web cam image etc available as a button or drop down but I couldn’t quite see what the benefit was over normal html which would be far more flexible…

However the next feature we’re working on is integration with the Boltek lightning detector and Nextstorm software. It’s looking quite promising and we hope to be able to provide similar functionality to the stormvue java applet but as an option for WDL.

Julian

For those who are html-savvy, it probably is much more flexible and allows for quick re-do’s when you have changes in what you wish to present.

for those who are still learning to walk in the web page implementation, your program offers a way to take a new product, view the clear documentation and excellent examples, and hand hold us through to a professional appearing product in the space of 1/2 hour.

For that reason, IF there isn’t too much fiddling around, being able to offer this as a reasonable option, keep it in mind as you begin to run out of things to do! :javascript:emoticon(‘:wink:’)

Just an observation about some of the javascript stuff for the other lightning programs:

A local enthusiast has his page ofweather, timelapse web cam images, National Weather Service radar, and his own Boltek station on a web page, see

http://www.lorick.net

for an example.

One thing I’ve noticed about these programs is that they seem to behave vastly differently on different computers/operating systems.

For example, I have viewed his lightning web page using both the Nexstorm and Nexstorm Java and have seen two results. The Windows XP systems seem to handle the Java for well, but Win 2000 based systems flash and flicker the screen so much and interrupt background tasks to a degree that I’ve stopped using it.

Perhaps this represents progress and that the Win2000 system should be turned into XP, but there are certain PCI cards and scanners that will not run under XP, so I’m stuck. I would hope that any web site software would run smoothly on the receiving user’s machine, and so far this older one doesn’t like Nexstorm’s very professional appearing display.

Right now I’m using Lightning 2000 by Aninoquisi and have been pleased with the local display it offers. Since I’ve purchased this one, and the author continues to update it, I’d hate to abandon it to buy the (relatively expensive) NexStorm just to add a local lightning display to my weather web.

You know, perhaps this will be a challenge to me to finally get off my duff and do more with web page design, but for now I’m very happy with the solution you’ve offered to me to get these data on a viewable page.

Thanks again for all your work. Despite all these little quibbles, it is a very stable, wonderfully designed and appearing piece of software.

PS. If you come up with something that needs a few users to play with implementation and interface with various computer variations, let me know when the Beta needs another evaluation and I’d be happy to give it a whirl.

Dale

the lightning display will be a macromedia flash display, like WDL, and not java…

i have contacted the author of lightning 2000 re getting data to WD like nexstorm does

he was not interested…said he was too busy, and it was not worth his time
i even offered to help him with the source code needed…

Well, pooh on him I guess.

I don’t know how much tweaking a program takes after it is in relatively quiet state. I know that the basic Boltek software itself hasn’t been updated in about a year and a half. sort of a niche market, I’ll agree.

Well, I’ll keep the ear to the ground, and await your results with this next update. I’m sure the little things can take an enormous amount of time. Considering the work I put into my little program to gather, display and archive data from an old Heath “Blue faced” weather station ( the ID-5001), compared to what you’re doing with not one but a multitude of stations with various sensors, I’m glad to pay the meager royalties you guys ask for such a wonderful set of products.

the shared memory address routines use windows api calls…
all the work is done for you…you just need to know the format needed, create it,
then write the data (as a string) to the memory location you assign…and thats about it…only 10 lines of code needed…

Amazing. I guess all this idea about not re-inventing the wheel is good, such as you’ve demonstrated.

In future communications, as a paying user, perhaps I’ll let the Lightning 2000 programmer know that there are guys like me who own the program that would like additional functionality. If the selling of the program is a pure hobby and support and changes can only be done on his schedule, well, I’ll have to take that into effect when updating.

Certainly authors expect and need feedback to know what their users are doing and looking for. I’ll be sure to give it. But as most End User agreements say, you get what I sell you, warts and all.

No guarantee it will work.

actualy, his main income is from lightning 2000…
and nexstorm is a real threat to him…all he did was slag off about nexstorm…and how its data is not accurate, something about maps…the guy had a real bee in his bonnet about something…and so i was on the backfoot it seems just mentioning nexstorm…
but if people can convince him to make the data available via a shared memory address (which is very fast), then that would be great